TIGER is supporting two bills that have been introduced to the Tennessee Legislature:
SB 0620 / HB 0099
(introduced by Senator Woodson and Representatives Winningham and Brooks)
This bill would allow Tennessee high schools to enter into cooperative arrangements with colleges to develop programs targeted at two groups of students: 1) at-risk students who may drop out of school, and 2) students who would benefit from accelerated academic instruction.
Specifically, the bill states that “Cooperative innovative high school programs that offer accelerated learning programs shall:
(1) Provide a flexible, customized program of instruction for students who would benefit from accelerated, higher level coursework or early graduation from high school;
(2) Enable students to obtain a high school diploma in less than four years, to begin or complete an associate degree program, to master a certificate or vocational program, or to earn up to two years of college credit; and
(3) Offer a college preparatory academic core and in-depth studies in a career or technical field that will lead to advanced programs or employment opportunities in engineering, health sciences, or teaching.”
SB 2008 / HB 1872
(introduced by Senator Southerland and Representative Hawk)
This bill authorizes the creation of a "cyber schools," where most/all instruction would be completed online. This type of virtual school can be particularly useful for high achieving and gifted students in small school districts. Small districts frequently lack both the number of students and resources to offer a wide range of honors, AP, and other challenging courses. A well developed cyber or virtual school would allow these students to tap into challenging courses their districts are unable to offer.
Monday, March 5, 2007
Thursday, March 1, 2007
New State Gifted Rules
For the last two years or so, the Tennessee Department of Education has had a Task Force working on new eligibility and evaluation rules for gifted education. A draft set of rules was submitted to the State Board of Education for approval last August, but passage has been delayed by concerns raised by the Tennessee Association of Administrators of Special Education (TAASE).
On March 1, the Department of Education hosted a meeting attended by members of TAASE, the Tennessee Association for the Gifted (TAG), and TIGER, as well as a State Board member, State Board staff, and Department staff to try and resolve outstanding issues. Considerable progress was made, with TAASE, TAG, and TIGER coming to a shared agreement on language in two key areas:
-1- Modifying/amending the definition of “Adverse Affects” so that it makes sense for gifted students. For all areas of Special Education, services are only provided when there is evidence of an adverse affect, and the current rule has been used by some districts to deny services to gifted students who are making no progress in school so long as they are getting “A’s” and “B’s.” The proposed language would read: “For intellectually gifted students, “Adverse Affect” means the general curriculum alone is inadequate to appropriately meet the student’s educational needs.”
-2- Adding language to require that at least one school staff member attending an evaluation meeting (whether the regular classroom teacher, school psychologist, or special education teacher) have training in the characteristics of gifted children.
It is anticipated that these and the rest of the rules revisions will be back before the Tennessee State Board of Education at its next meeting, scheduled for April 20.
On March 1, the Department of Education hosted a meeting attended by members of TAASE, the Tennessee Association for the Gifted (TAG), and TIGER, as well as a State Board member, State Board staff, and Department staff to try and resolve outstanding issues. Considerable progress was made, with TAASE, TAG, and TIGER coming to a shared agreement on language in two key areas:
-1- Modifying/amending the definition of “Adverse Affects” so that it makes sense for gifted students. For all areas of Special Education, services are only provided when there is evidence of an adverse affect, and the current rule has been used by some districts to deny services to gifted students who are making no progress in school so long as they are getting “A’s” and “B’s.” The proposed language would read: “For intellectually gifted students, “Adverse Affect” means the general curriculum alone is inadequate to appropriately meet the student’s educational needs.”
-2- Adding language to require that at least one school staff member attending an evaluation meeting (whether the regular classroom teacher, school psychologist, or special education teacher) have training in the characteristics of gifted children.
It is anticipated that these and the rest of the rules revisions will be back before the Tennessee State Board of Education at its next meeting, scheduled for April 20.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)